 *

DERIVATION OF THE TRINITY  Contd

THEREFORE…

1. 136 = 1 (1 + 3 + 6 = 10 = 1)
2. 163 = 1 (1 + 6 + 3 = 10 = 1)
3. 199 = 1 (1 + 9 + 9 = 19 = 1)

*

HENCE…

1. 1…
2. 1…
3. 1…

Within the set of whole numbers, then, we have three different formulations of One.

As all other numbers can be reduced to this set the formulation is universally binding for all numbers.

One is intrinsic…

*

Recognising the numerical basis of a religious doctrine is no mean feat.

It has ramifications for our thinking.

We may wish to reformulate our definition of this doctrine.

It would be remiss to regard such a notion as irrational when, by definition, it could not be more rational.

One-ness is intrinsic.

Three-ness is essential.

We may also wish to play…

*

…  For obvious reasons, three of anything, is traditionally depicted as a triangle…

Not withstanding our preoccupation with purely symbolic notions of dimension the triangle of number appears to have a base of points one and two and a peak of point three.

Put simply, this is because the qualities of points one and two reflect, and are summed in point three.

As this is an accumulative process it may be as well to move clockwise around the triangle.

Triangle of Number

3. (1 as 199) 2. (1 as 163)                        1. (1 as 136)

*

And this is where the fun really kicks in…

Triangle of Cosmology

Moon

*

Triangle of Generation

Child Father                 Mother

*

Triangle of Psychology

Sun Moon                    Earth

* ## 2 thoughts on “Triads: Derivations…”

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.