“What,” asked my correspondent, enquiring about the School, “is magic?” It is not the first time I have been asked that question, once the difference between performance magic and the magical work of the esoteric path has been established.
Read any tale of magic, or indeed, the centuries-old treatises and grimoires that survive, and you would have to assume that magical work is all about gaining control. Spirits, demons, elementals and angels, all are to be summoned by the magician and bound to his bidding. Even those who have trained within an established and respected magical system will still use the old forms that look and sound as if this is the case. Young students who are just starting out on their path may well hold a vision of standing on a mountaintop commanding the storm like a Hollywood Merlin, anticipating the wild exhilaration of power. Are they deluded? Is there something real behind the dream? Or are they simply destined for disappointment?
The universe is held together by vast, natural forces; amongst them are many things science does not and may never understand. Is it really possible for a single human soul to take control of the machinery of the cosmos?
In his book, Magick in Theory and Practice, Aleister Crowley defined magic as “the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in conformity with Will.” Crowley, quite justifiably, acquired a polarising reputation amongst contemporary occultists that continues amongst their more modern successors. At best, that reputation is ambivalent, at worst downright unsavoury, but few would deny the value of his body of written work to the serious student of magic. Personally, I found his books invaluable… as long as you strip back the intentional blinds and ambiguities that are strewn throughout and read them with clear eyes.
Crowley’s definition is, in my opinion, probably the clearest and most concise way of describing magic. Yet, even in such a short phrase, there is enough ambiguity to lead the seeker astray. Over the years, I reached the conclusion that the magician’s quest for control is accurately described, but lacking one significant clue to the true nature of magical work; the arcane forces that are to be brought under control are all elements of our own being. We are part of the universe and its forces flow through us and have their echoes within us. The dark and bright aspects may be externalised and personified in order that we might work with them, but their source and the result of that work is the same; what changes is the magician.
On the surface at least, that sounds as if all you would have to do is train the will and bring it under full control and focus, in order to effect change. That would fit the common understanding of the type of magic of which neophytes might dream. It is, I believe, behind the misconception that human will is the highest manifestation of man. But what if the Will of Crowley’s definition is not our own, but that of the Divine? Is it then not saying that magic is the art and science of causing change by conforming to, and aligning ourselves with a Higher Will than our own? Creating change, both within the world and within ourselves, in accordance with the Cosmic Will. When you get right down to it, that is pretty much the aim of all spiritual and religious practices, regardless of the name or definition that is applied to divinity.
The definition is a clever one, precisely because of its ambiguity. Within the phrase lies the story of the seeker’s quest… a journey from the reactions and desires of the ego, through realisation, to harmony. How it is read reflects where we are on the path and whether it is to our own will or a higher Will that we surrender ourselves.
Within the Silent Eye, it is this change from within that we seek and encourage, allowing our Companions to seek their own, personal path to realisation and their own door to open to the forces of being. But where does that leave our hopeful Merlin? Is there no storm to control after all? No wild exultation to feel as the forces of the universe course through him, body, mind and soul? On the contrary, once we ’open up and get out of the way’, setting the stormy and imperative desires of the ego aside and allowing the universal forces free expression, through and within us, we experience that change in accordance with Will. And that is truly magical.
Reblogged this on The Light Behind the Story.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for sharing, Alethea xx
LikeLike
There is a lot of ponder on in this post, Sue.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Robbie.
LikeLike
I don’t think I have ever read anything that defines ‘magic’ quite as well as you have, Sue…
I may need to read this more than once…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Jaye. It is not an easy one to define as everyone has their own ideas about it already, even if they have never looked at it any closer than through fiction.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are even people who don’t think magic exists…
LikeLike
It all depends upon what you believe it to be 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fascinating reading, Sue. Describing ‘magic’ is a little like touching something special, which isn’t really there. Or is it? I’m a complete nerd on the subject but think one can feel something akin to magic has happened to them, without being able to define it. I bow to your description. x
LikeLiked by 1 person
Magic is real and definitely ‘there’, Joy… but is not always what we might like to imagine 😉
LikeLike
A wonderful description, Sue. You have given us much food for thought here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Viv.
LikeLike
It sounds like a process of surrender and realization.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is, though it can take some strange turning along the way…
LikeLiked by 1 person
There will always be mysteries in the world.
LikeLike
I hope so, Audrey 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
That ‘control over’ rather than ‘journeying within’ always got up my nose. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is a great motif for fantasy though 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on France & Vincent.
LikeLiked by 2 people
A beautiful vivid description of magic.which has left me much to ponder on…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Carol.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aleister Crowley is one of those controversial figures to everyone who studies any level of magic, from horoscopes to Tarot, from spell-casting to some very strange and as you so well put it, unsavory practices. Yet every serious Tarot reader I’ve known worked with the Crowley deck and we all had to read his work. Not once either. Usually, you need a few reads before you can sort through what he is saying … and even after many readings, there are large pieces that I don’t get, often because there is something about the passages that I find objectionable or simply refuse to accept. I do know that he always made me uncomfortable. There was something a little bit lethal about him except to say I wouldn’t buy a used car from him — or a Tarot reading. He always seemed to have an agenda of his own, unspoken or obscurely written.
I want magic to be real, now more than ever because reality has become so ugly in so many ways. I would like that powerful group of wizards to climb that mountain and fix the world we have so badly abused. It would be a lot easier than trying to get the governments of the world to work together. We have trouble getting any group in this country to agree on anything. The wizards of great power sound like a far better way to go. Too bad they don’t exist.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are many who work towards creating that beter world… both magically and by more obvious means. I will not lose hope.
LikeLike
I live in hope.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on The Sisters of the Fey and commented:
The definition of Magic; The Silent Eye
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s a pretty cool point. What we can do on our own can be impressive but what we can do with the help of others and the divine is magical.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Working with others always amplifies what we can achieve.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Magic is the one we call the real nature of the Nature…
LikeLike
As part of Nature, its nature is our own.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, we are all part of that nature…
LikeLiked by 1 person