bath 142

It is undoubtedly an incredible piece of craftsmanship. It is unbelievably impressive…designed specifically to be awe-inspiring, streaming light and colour into the great cavern of the Abbey. It is also just too big to be able to  make any sense of the images it contains… Had I  not seen other Tree of Jesse windows before, recognising the recumbent figure of the dreamer, I wouldn’t have had a clue what it was I was looking at. It is only later, with the help of the camera, that I am able to see the individual scenes depicted in the great, towering window of the south transept of Bath Abbey… and the east window is even harder to decipher.

We wondered why.

Politics, probably… the intent of the builders hovering somewhere between raising an edifice of the utmost beauty to the glory of their God and the desire to impress upon all who entered its portals the power and supremacy of the Church itself. In so doing they seem to have forgotten that their primary function was supposed to be to teach the words of a humble man to other humble men.

Given that the stained glass and the earlier wall paintings of these magnificent and beautiful churches were designed originally to convey the stories of the Bible, the saints and the virtues of the faith to the faithful, it seems rather pointless to make them so grand they cease to fulfill their function. Their very magnificence renders them indecipherable to the naked eye… in effect, their stories become so remote and impersonal as to be invisible.

bath 179

It is only when you can actually get close enough to see the painted faces that any connection is made with the subjects they portray…and it is through the emotional connection that religious teaching has always been promulgated, either with the gentle message of Love or through the fear of hellfire and brimstone. It has to be personal. Without that contact with the emotions, such teachings remain too distant to take root in the heart where faith must grow if it is to be a true and personal relationship with the divine … by whatever Name we come to know it.

The same concept applies to all our life-lessons. Unless they touch our emotions in some way, we take little note of the events, great and small, that make up our lives, events that may be there and gone in an instant. There are 31556952 seconds in a single year… each one already in the past before you know it is there… each one capable of being a pivotal point of understanding, of change, of realisation. Multiply that by our traditional ‘three-score years and ten’ and the number is just too great to comprehend… too distant to seem as if it has any relevance in our lives… too big to know how to even read the number correctly… Yet we will grumble at wasting two minutes of those lives … a mere 120 seconds… in a queue. Those seconds are relevant…they are small enough for us to come to terms with… small enough to understand their waste on something annoyingly unimportant, yet big enough for us to see what else they could have been spent upon. Annoyance and frustration make them real to us.

There are 3600 seconds in an hour…and an hour spent with someone you love, doing something you love…even dreaming about somewhere you love… is an hour well-spent. It makes you smile, relax… feel good about life. We can understand the passing of an hour. It is small enough to be personal… yet can hold enough to make life feel as if it is pure gold and we the richest of creatures.

There are 2.208e+9 seconds in seventy years. See what I mean? Except for the mathematicians amongst us, such a number holds neither warmth nor possibility… it is too far from our everyday comprehension to hold any relevance. It is too big… too impersonal.

Our way of life is becoming more and more remote. The personal touch is being lost to scripted phone calls, self service checkouts, automated business … even our social lives are often lived largely online. Youngsters will even text each other when they are in the same house. The distance between human hearts and the lack of contact in a society that shuns the intrusion of personal space can isolate us insidiously. Automation is saving money for businesses and organisations to the point where fewer people need to be employed and I wonder how far society is moving towards losing  the ability to connect with each other and solve problems through building a personal relationship that starts with a simple smile.

It doesn’t really matter if it is a beautiful edifice divorced from the heart of its purpose by its own grandeur or the two pairs of eyes, gateways to the soul, that slide away from each other for fear of an illusory intrusion… without that personal touch, we cannot reach each other and we are prisoned in glass stained by our own tears.

bath 154

12 thoughts on “Personal

  1. Well argued and very nicely presented. Numbers that size are generally presented, when talking miles or kilometres, in light years. Does anyone outside science and scientific research understand how far 1 light year is? It’s the time taken by light to cover thousands upon thousands of miles. I hate the fact that our billion was reduced to match the American value of 1,000 million. It meant more when it was a million million, and 1 trillion used to be a billion billion but now it’s a thousand billion. Why couldn’t numbers have been universally the same as we knew them? Anyway I digress, when numbers become too big no-one really understands them anymore. Seconds in an hour we can all get, start talking about the number of seconds in a year and some can’t comprehend that figure never mind the seconds in a standard life of 3 score years plus 10.


      1. My point was when you start talking in numbers that big not many do. Hence memory for computers being in mega, giga or terabytes rather than so many millions or billions of bytes. But not many people understand the difference between them (I know that 1,024 bytes make a kilobyte because 2 bits make one byte but does the average woman in the street understand the concept?). Do we need to know all these different numbers? For peace of mind I’d say not.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. That was my point too. It is in the smaller numbers that we can relate to things… the bigger ones are too distant-seeming to hold much personal meaning. We may be able to define and use such concepts…indeed, that is obviously why we invented the levels of numbering in stages… but can we feel anything but dwarfed and confused by such vast scales if we try and apply them to our own lives?

          Liked by 1 person

Please leave a comment - we would love to hear from you

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.